Mandatory joint pay model slashes spending in just eight months

By Virgil Dickson  | September 6, 2018

A mandatory pay model aimed at reducing Medicare spending on joint replacement surgeries was able to save money in its first year. The CMS in recent years has scaled back and canceled mandatory models.

Under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program, average total payments decreased by 3.9% or $1,127 compared to hospitals not participating in the model, according to federal data released Wednesday. At the same time, researchers observed no statistically significant changes in the quality of care as measured by readmission rates, emergency department visits, and deaths.

Advertisement

The program gives hospitals a fixed payment for all services related to joint replacement surgeries from admission to 90 days after the procedure, with no additional payments for complications, readmissions or post-acute services.

“Possibly the most notable outcome during the first CJR model performance year was that statistically significant changes in utilization and payments occurred so quickly,” the report said.

The study analyzed results from 731 CJR participant hospitals and 841 hospitals not in the experiment, which lasted from April 1 to Dec. 31, 2016.

Last year, the CMS scaled back the CJR program citing the burden of the program and the belief that models should be largely voluntary. The CJR model is now only mandatory in 34 geographic areas compared to 67 geographic areas when it first launched.

The agency estimates that 465 hospitals are participating in the effort. That figure is down from 800 acute-care hospitals that were expected to participate in the program.

After interviewing hospital staff, researchers said there may not have been a change in the practice of medicine at these facilities had the experiment not been mandatory.

“These findings suggest that a mandatory model may impel action across a broad range of hospitals that may not otherwise have acted to reduce episode payments,” the report said.

Proponents of value-based care hope the results will encourage the CMS to reconsider the use of mandatory models. Many of the hospitals in CJR are ones that chose to skip other pay models such as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative, according to Andrew Ryan, an associate professor in the department of health management and policy at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health.

 

READ THE REST HERE

 

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Advertisement